<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Scrape my rss feed please. Need free backlinks!</title> <atom:link href="http://trevornashkeller.com/blogging/scrape-my-rss-feed-please-need-free-backlinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://trevornashkeller.com/blogging/scrape-my-rss-feed-please-need-free-backlinks/</link> <description>That White Hat Guy.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <item><title>By: Angel</title><link>http://trevornashkeller.com/blogging/scrape-my-rss-feed-please-need-free-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-6009</link> <dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:00:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://trevornashkeller.com/?p=182#comment-6009</guid> <description>Great comment reply Trevor.
If a splog outranks you then someone really needs to reconsider many many things.
One of the things google checks is the time of the posting, so 99% of the time, your post is gonna be first.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment reply Trevor.<br
/> If a splog outranks you then someone really needs to reconsider many many things.<br
/> One of the things google checks is the time of the posting, so 99% of the time, your post is gonna be first.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trevor</title><link>http://trevornashkeller.com/blogging/scrape-my-rss-feed-please-need-free-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-5651</link> <dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://trevornashkeller.com/?p=182#comment-5651</guid> <description>Well 1.) if the splog is going to outrank your blog, your blog probably sucks. 2.) If you didn&#039;t have the link you would be getting NOTHING from the splog ripping off your content. 3.) Look around for information on duplicate content a bit more...its not as black and white as you think.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well 1.) if the splog is going to outrank your blog, your blog probably sucks. 2.) If you didn&#8217;t have the link you would be getting NOTHING from the splog ripping off your content. 3.) Look around for information on duplicate content a bit more&#8230;its not as black and white as you think.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: FarEast</title><link>http://trevornashkeller.com/blogging/scrape-my-rss-feed-please-need-free-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-5645</link> <dc:creator>FarEast</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:38:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://trevornashkeller.com/?p=182#comment-5645</guid> <description>Yes, we will get multiple backlink if someone scrape our full feed, but remember..we also WILL get the multiple duplicate contents. Isn&#039;t it? Then, how come if the splog blog have better ranking then our blog that present the original content?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we will get multiple backlink if someone scrape our full feed, but remember..we also WILL get the multiple duplicate contents. Isn&#8217;t it? Then, how come if the splog blog have better ranking then our blog that present the original content?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trevor</title><link>http://trevornashkeller.com/blogging/scrape-my-rss-feed-please-need-free-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-5613</link> <dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:21:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://trevornashkeller.com/?p=182#comment-5613</guid> <description>Yeah it is nice to get them physically at your site, I will agree with that.  It is also easier to keep them on your site when they are actually at it, compared to them reading the feed.  A bit further down the road I will try out using summaries just to see the response and difference in traffic flow.I think overall though I will keep the full feed.  Seems to be what the majority of readers want.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it is nice to get them physically at your site, I will agree with that.  It is also easier to keep them on your site when they are actually at it, compared to them reading the feed.  A bit further down the road I will try out using summaries just to see the response and difference in traffic flow.</p><p>I think overall though I will keep the full feed.  Seems to be what the majority of readers want.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ad Hustler</title><link>http://trevornashkeller.com/blogging/scrape-my-rss-feed-please-need-free-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-5612</link> <dc:creator>Ad Hustler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:18:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://trevornashkeller.com/?p=182#comment-5612</guid> <description>Decent concept.  The reason I use summaries however, is that I want people at my site, exposed to my brand, while they read my ramblings :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decent concept.  The reason I use summaries however, is that I want people at my site, exposed to my brand, while they read my ramblings <img
src='http://trevornashkeller.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/43 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached

Served from: trevornashkeller.com @ 2010-08-01 02:58:21 -->